carbonfree.co.uk
13th March 2008

Promoting the green design, construction, renovation and operation of buildings could cut North American greenhouse gas emissions that are fuelling climate change more deeply, quickly and cheaply than any other available measure, according to a new report issued by the trinational Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC).

North America’s buildings cause the annual release of more than 2,200 megatons of CO2 into the atmosphere, about 35 percent of the continent’s total. The report says rapid market uptake of currently available and emerging advanced energy-saving technologies could result in over 1,700 fewer megatons of CO2 emissions in 2030, compared to projected emissions that year following a business-as-usual approach. A cut of that size would nearly equal the CO2 emitted by the entire US transportation sector in 2000.

It is common now for more advanced green buildings to routinely reduce energy usage by 30, 40, or even 50 percent over conventional buildings, with the most efficient buildings now performing more than 70 percent better than conventional properties, according to the report.

Despite proven environmental, economic and health benefits, however, green building today accounts for a only small fraction of new home and commercial building construction—just two percent of the new non-residential building market, less than half of one percent of the residential market in the United States and Canada, and less than that in Mexico.

The report, Green Building in North America: Opportunities and Challenges, is the result of a two-year study by the CEC Secretariat. It was prepared with advice from an international advisory group of prominent developers and architects, sustainability and energy experts, real estate appraisers and brokers, together with local and national government representatives.

“Improving our built environment is probably the single greatest opportunity to protect and enhance the natural environment. This report is a blueprint for dramatic environmental progress throughout North America—mostly using the tools and technology we have on hand today,” says CEC Executive Director Adrián Vázquez. “Green building represents some of the ripest ‘low-hanging fruit’ for achieving significant reductions in climate change emissions.”

Even with rapid growth projected in the green building market across all three countries, the report says public and private sectors must embrace substantial changes to the planning, development and financing of commercial and residential buildings to overcome what it says are significant barriers to the widespread adoption of high-performance buildings throughout North America.

Jonathan Westeinde, managing partner of The Windmill Development Group in Ottawa and the CEC’s advisory group chair, states “As a developer, I rely on the fact that green building is a proven concept—with construction costs and market benefits that are rapidly improving. This report shows what is needed to scale up and put green building at the heart of a healthy, energy-secure North America.”

The report highlights the importance of green building in urban development. Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, whose city hosted a CEC symposium on green building in May 2007, states, “Green building is a cornerstone for creating strong, sustainable communities. In Seattle, we are convinced that cities that make the commitment and investment in green development now will have a significant advantage in the long run.”

Report authors describe a number of disincentives to green building to be overcome. For example, how to encourage developers to incur the marginal cost of green building features when the long-term energy-saving benefits will be passed on to the new owners or tenants.

They recommend ways to accelerate the market uptake of green building and make it the standard practice for all new construction and renovation of existing buildings in North America. Among its recommendations, the report calls upon North American government, industry and nongovernmental leaders to:

Create national, multi-stakeholder task forces charged with achieving a vision for green building in North America;

Support the creation of a North American set of principles and planning tools for green building;

Set clear targets to achieve the most rapid possible adoption of green building in North America, including aggressive targets for carbon-neutral or net zero-energy buildings, together with performance monitoring to track progress towards these targets;

Enhance ongoing or new support for green building, including efforts to promote private sector investment and proper valuation methods; and

Increase knowledge of green building through research and development, capacity building, and the use of labels and disclosures on green building performance. The recommendations complement ongoing efforts by federal, state/provincial and local governments as well as industry and trade associations and nongovernmental organizations.

The CEC study notes several government and industry initiatives that promote aggressive energy performance improvements in the building sector. One study completed for the report signals the potential of green building to yield tremendous energy improvements and greenhouse gas emissions reductions in the building sector by 2030, and suggests a path toward zero net-energy and carbon-neutral buildings.


number227 wrote on Mar 16
mega-structures and high-rises use VAST amounts of energy daily and wastes an unbelievable amount of all sorts of resources when you think about it. Water, paper, tons of electricity, unproductive workers sapping computer energy-- not to mention food, trash,human waste that is produced in vast amounts in a "city within a building"!
It just reminds me that big business has industrialized the use of humans similar to putting millions of hens in cages, feeding/watering them, removing their waste products and then taking their eggs for a profit!! How is this any different?
Half the time there is no tangible product or service that the people are actually producing in the buildings, just virtual communication - or as with a bank, just counting numbers, reporting, or financing another unqualified loan recipient! It's Babel all over again.
zionsake wrote on Mar 16
What you're saying about office buildings reminds me of the story of two people who were talking in front of a building. One pointed towards the building and said: "How many people are working in this building?" "O," the other one answered, "probably about half of them!"

You're certainly making a case for working from home. Actually, I haven't read about it for a long time. It definitely has advantage for companies i.t.o. needing to rent expensive office space, time wasted by staff to travel, etc. Video conferencing also contributes to less traveling, while enabling people to talk face to face.

Thin-film PV applied to windows could turn buildings into power houses.
amos914 wrote on Mar 17
Thin-film PV applied to windows could turn buildings into power houses.
Is Thin-film expensive? Could I apply it to windows in my home that face the sun? That would be really neat to be able to use thin strips instead of the old ugly bulky panels...
zionsake wrote on Mar 17
amos914 said
Is Thin-film expensive? Could I apply it to windows in my home that face the sun? That would be really neat to be able to use thin strips instead of the old ugly bulky panels...
I really don't know where to buy it or how much it will cost. One will, of course, need to install a complete system to be able to use the electricity that is produced.

Check the internet. Experiments to print thin film with an ink-yet printer has also been successful. Try the http://store.altenergystore.com/?source=reaccessIRTOP500 to see what they have - including HOW TO courses.

Solar Oven: http://shop.solardirect.com/index.php?cPath=22_74

Try also: http://www.SolarNightIndustries.com
Add a Comment
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help